Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Efavirenz use and contraceptive methods in HIV-positive women in a large urban cohort

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 3 and
  • 3
Journal of the International AIDS Society201013(Suppl 4):P112

https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-S4-P112

Published: 8 November 2010

Keywords

  • Efavirenz
  • Contraceptive Method
  • Hormonal Contraceptive
  • Unplanned Pregnancy
  • Hormonal Contraception

Background

Despite increasing reports of successful pregnancies whilst using Efavirenz (EFZ), the drug remains Category C during pregnancy due to concerns around teratogenicity [1]. Additionally, EFZ can render many hormonal methods of contraception less effective. For these reasons, UK guidance suggests that HIV positive women should be informed of these effects before commencing treatment [2]. Following a case in this unit where a young HIV-positive woman had an unplanned pregnancy whilst using Implanon and taking EFZ/Truvada, we examined contraceptive use and advice given to women in our cohort using EFZ, and then instigated changes to improve practice in this area.

Methods

Case-note review of all women taking EFZ in Jan 2008 and again in Feb 2010. Current contraception used, advice on teratogenicity, and advice on efficacy documentation was recorded. Women over 50, with documented menopause or hysterectomy were excluded.

Results

In 2008 we identified 31 females using EFZ in our cohort of 912 patients. Contraceptive choices are shown in Figure 1. 68% were using an 'effective' method of contraception (one not liable to reduced efficacy when using EFZ - condoms, IUS/IUD, sterilisation or recently documented no partner). 36% had documented advice regarding teratogenicity and 75% regarding reduced efficacy of hormonal methods. Following these results we introduced a section for contraception on our clinical review form (which is updated at each HIV clinic review) to act as a prompt for clinicians. After this change was made, we re-examining these data following this in 2010 (See Fig 1) and found 35 females using EFZ. 80% were using an 'effective' method of contraception, 50% had documented advice on teratogenicity and 100% regarding reduced efficacy of hormonal contraception (if appropriate).
Figure 1

Figure 1

Conclusions

Simple changes such as adding contraception to a clinic proforma can help improve sexual and reproductive health outcomes in HIV positive women. However, there are still improvements to be made in documentation of advice given, particularly when using a Category C drug in women who may become pregnant. Additionally, women should be made aware of the potential interaction between antiretrovirals and hormonal contraceptives at the HIV clinic — particularly as some may not disclose their status to Family Planning or GP services and therefore we cannot assume that this advice is being given elsewhere.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Gartnavel General, Infection Unit, Brownlee Centre, Glasgow, UK
(2)
Sandyford Initiative, Glasgow, United Kingdom
(3)
Sandyford, Genitourinary Medicine, Glasgow, UK

References

  1. UK guidelines for the management of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of people living with HIV infection. Joint BHIVA-BASHH-FFP UK SRH guidelines. 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2007, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton New Jersey, Package insert dated January, 1212823A1Google Scholar

Copyright

© Taylor et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement