Volume 11 Supplement 1

Abstracts of the Ninth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection

Open Access

Assessment for sonographic grading scales of the body fat changes related to the lipoatrophic findings of HIV patients in treatment with HAART

  • R Gulizia1,
  • C Gervasoni2,
  • M Ortu2,
  • M Galli2 and
  • C Filice1
Journal of the International AIDS Society200811(Suppl 1):P119

https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-11-S1-P119

Published: 10 November 2008

Purpose of the study

To assess the accuracy of a sonographic based grading scale (US-GS) in identification of body fat changes (BFCs) related to lipoatrophy (LA) in HIV patients treated with antiretrovirals, compared with the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) based clinical diagnoses.

Methods

We enrolled non-obese HIV patients (73 males and 42 females; body mass index <27 kg/m2). Clinical assessments of BFCs were defined by correspondence between the self-reports of patients and medical examinations. Fat redistribution was scored separately for face, arm and lower limbs on a scale ranging from 0 (absence) to 1 (mid) and 2–3 (severe BFCs). US scans of subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) were performed at 3 reference points: transversal scan at the deepest point of Bichat pad (facial SFT), long dorsal scan of arm (brachial SFT), and long scan of anterior face of thigh (crural SFT).

Summary of results

There were no significant differences in demographics (age, body mass index) or clinical features (CD4 T lymphocytes, duration of HIV infection and duration of HAART) between males or females with no LA (HOPS grading scale 0), or those with mid LA (HOPS grading scale 1) or severe LA (HOPS grading scale 2–3). Significant differences were found in US assessments for each corresponding HOPS-GS (p ranged from <0.03 to 0.0004). Diagnostic thresholds were identified for the assessment of each degree of LA severity (US-GS 0 vs. US-GS 1 and US-GS 2–3) for facial, brachial and crural LA, with related sensitivity (range: 70–99%), specificity (range: 70–95%), positive likelihood ratios (range: 2.83–11.2) and negative likelihood ratios (range: 0.07–0.41). A logistic regression showed that the US-GS correctly diagnosed the 80.9% of all cases of LA (regression coefficient: 2.1 (SE: 0.54), p < 0.0001) with an odds ratio of 8.1 (95% CI: 2. 8 to 23.5).

Conclusion

US shows significant correlation with the HOPS based assessments. Significant areas under the ROC curves, distinct diagnostic thresholds with high sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios suggest that US is reliable for the diagnosis of LA. Compared to the HOPS, the US-GS shows high percentages of correctly classified cases of LA. Serial assessments could identify early BFCs related to HAART or be used to prevent advanced stages. It could suggest the need for proactive switching therapies or identify the SFT recovery in response to reactive switching therapies.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Infectious and Tropical Disease Division of Foundation IRCCS San Matteo
(2)
III° Division of Infectious and Tropical Disease, L.Sacco Hospital

Copyright

© Gulizia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement