Skip to main content

Table 1 Inputs in computer simulation

From: Alternative antiretroviral monitoring strategies for HIV-infected patients in east Africa: opportunities to save more lives?

Variable

Base case

Plausible range in sensitivity analysis

Source

Characteristics of simulated cohort

   

Age

39 (SD 9)

NA

AMPATH

CD4 count (cells/mm3)

126 (SD 127)

NA

AMPATH

Viral load (Log 10 units)

4.5 (SD 1)

NA

AMPATH

% Male

38%

NA

AMPATH

Initial cART regimen

Nevirapine + either ziduvidine or stavudine + other NRTI

NA

AMPATH

Second cART regimen

Boosted PI + two other NRTIs other than those in initial regimen

NA

AMPATH

Probabilities and rates

   

Compliance with cART (proportion of doses taken as directed)

0.85

0.75-0.95

Imputed from calibration

Probability that mutation potentially causing resistance, results in resistance, NRTI or PI

0.50

Varied jointly from 0.5X to 1.5X, bounded by 0 and 1

Johnson et al [21]

Probability mutation potentially causing resistance, results in resistance, NNRTI

0.90

Varied jointly from 0.5X to 1.5X, bounded by 0 and 1

Johnson et al [21]

Probability of cross-resistance to other NRTI, given NRTI mutation conferring resistance (ziduvidine or stavudine)

1.0

Varied jointly from 0.5X to 1.5X, bounded by 0 and 1

Johnson et al [21]

Probability of cross-resistance to other NRTI, given NRTI mutation conferring resistance (other)

0.48

Varied jointly from 0.5X to 1.5X, bounded by 0 and 1

Johnson et al [21]

Probability of cross resistance to other PI, given PI mutation causing resistance

0.24

Varied jointly from 0.5X to 1.5X, bounded by 0 and 1

Johnson et al [21]

Probability of cross resistance to other NNRTI, given NNRTI mutation causing resistance

0.88

Varied jointly from 0.5X to 1.5X, bounded by 0 and 1

Johnson et al [21]

Rate of accumulating resistance mutations, per year

0.18

0.014-0.018

Braithwaite et al [14]

Viral load decrement with cART consisting of 2 NRTIs + efavirenz (100% adherence)

3.09

Varied jointly from -1 to +1

Braithwaite et al [22]

Viral load decrement with cART consisting of 2 NRTIs + nevirapine (100% adherence)

2.22

Varied jointly from -1 to +1

Braithwaite et al [22]

Viral load decrement with cART consisting of boosted PI (100% adherence)

2.68

Varied jointly from -1 to +1

Braithwaite et al [22]

Augmentation in HIV-related mortality, multiplicative

1

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

Assumption

Augmentation in non-HIV-related mortality, multiplicative

1

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

Assumption

Utilities

   

Decrease in utility with cART

0.053

Varied jointly from -0.05 to +0.05

Braithwaite et al 2007 [23]

Utility with CD4 < 100 cells/mm3

0.81

Varied jointly from -0.05 to +0.05

Freedberg et al 1998 [24]

Utility with CD4 between 100 cells/mm3 and 199 cells/mm3

0.87

Varied jointly from -0.05 to +0.05

Freedberg et al 1998 [24]

Utility with CD4 200 cells/mm3 and above

0.94

Varied jointly from -0.05 to +0.05

Freedberg et al 1998 [24]

Costs (2008 US$)

   

Cost of outpatient care, annually, without cART ($/month)

$288

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

AMPATH

Cost of care per hospitalization

$390

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

AMPATH

Cost of cART, annually, first regimen

$189

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

AMPATH

Cost of cART annually, second regimen

$1361

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

AMPATH

Cost of cART annually, third regimen

$3067

$1361 - $12,269

AMPATH, Red Book [25]

Cost of viral load test

$70.00

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

AMPATH

Cost of CD4 test

$11.20

Varied from 0.5X to 1.5X

AMPATH

  1. NA: not applicable; cART: combination antiretroviral therapy; NRTI: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI: protease inhibitor; NNRTI: non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor.