Skip to main content

Table 1 Concurrency rates for adult men and women from national studies reported by Halperin, Epstein, Morris-Kretzschmar and Mah, ranked by male concurrency

From: Concurrent sexual partnerships do not explain the HIV epidemics in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence

  

GPA Surveys

DHS Surveys

Other Surveys

 

Source

Country

Men

Women

Men

Women

Men

Women

Mean*

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Lesotho

55

39

    

47.0

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Côte d'Ivoire

36

NA

     

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Lusaka

22

11

    

16.5

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Tanzania

18

9

    

13.5

Caraël et al, 2001 [94]

Kampala

      

12.0

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Haiti

  

16.3

0.8

  

8.55

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Lesotho

  

14.1

NA

   

Morris, Kretzschmar, 2000 [26]

Rakai, Uganda

  

14.0

1.3

  

7.65

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Kenya

13

NA

     

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Mali

  

12.0

0.6

  

6.30

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Guinea

  

11.9

1.0

  

6.45

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Cameroon

  

11.7

3.2

  

7.45

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Niger

  

11.1

0.5

  

5.80

Adimora et al, 2007, 2002 [71, 72]

USA

    

11.0

12.0**

 

Leridon et al, 1998 [93]

Europe-6 countries

    

10.0

3.1

6.55

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Swaziland

  

8.5

0.7

  

4.60

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Senegal

  

8.3

NA

   

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Rio de Janeiro

7

0.4

    

3.70

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Zimbabwe

  

5.8

0.5

  

3.15

Kapiga, Lugalla, 2002 [67]

Tanzania

  

5.7

0.8

  

3.25

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Cambodia

  

3.5

0.2

  

1.85

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Manila,

3.0

3.0

    

3.00

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Thailand

3.0

0.2

    

1.60

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Rwanda

  

2.2

0.2

  

1.20

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Sri Lanka

2.0

1.0

    

1.50

Caraël, 1995 [46]

Singapore

2.0

0.2

    

1.10

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

Ethiopia

  

1.8

0.1

  

0.95

Mishra et al, 2009 [39]

India

  

1.0

0.1

  

1.05

  1. *Unweighted mean of men and women's concurrency
  2. **Previous 5 years
  3. NA = not ascertained
  4. Definitions: Caraël, 1995 [46] and Caraël et al, 2001 [94] asked about "regular" partners of one year or longer with whom respondent expected sex in the future; Mishra and Bignami-Van Assche, 2009 [39] Leridon et al, 2998 [93] Adimora et al, 2002 [71] Adimora et al, 2007 [72] and the Rakai survey used by Morris and Kretzschmar, 2000 [26] asked respondents beginning and ending dates of partnerships to determine overlap and did not exclude short-term partnerships; Kapiga and Lugalla, 2002 [67] asked about "regular" partners of one year or longer, not otherwise defined.