Skip to main content

Table 4 Adherence and acceptability of the Duet, by previous diaphragm experience (n = 83)

From: An acceptability and safety study of the Duet® cervical barrier and gel delivery system in Zimbabwe

 

Dia-naïve ppts (n = 41)

Dia-experienced ppts (n = 42)

p value*

Continuous regimen adherence

n

%

n

%

 

Duet regimen adherence

     

   Worn at least 80% of days

37

94.9

34

85.0

0.26

   Worn 100% of days

33

84.6

31

77.5

0.57

Duet adherence during sex

     

   Worn at least 80% of sex acts

38

97.4

36

90.0

0.36

   Worn 100% of sex acts

36

92.3

34

85.0

0.48

Precoital regimen adherence

     

Duet adherence during sex

     

   Worn at least 80% of sex acts

36

87.8

41

100.0

0.06

   Worn 100% of sex acts

35

85.4

38

92.7

0.48

Acceptability

     

Very comfortable wearing the Duet continuously

34

85.0

35

87.5

0.74

   Somewhat comfortable

6

15.0

4

10.0

 

   Not at all

0

-

1

2.5

 

Very comfortable inserting and removing the Duet before and after each act of sex

37

90.2

40

95.2

0.51

   Somewhat comfortable

3

7.3

2

4.8

 

   Not at all

1

2.4

0

-

 

Willingness to use Duet if you thought you were at risk for HIV and Duet could protect you

    

1.00

   I definitely would use the Duet

34

85.0

34

85.0

 

   I maybe would use the Duet

5

12.5

6

15.0

 

   I maybe would not use the Duet

1

2.5

0

-

 

   I definitely would not use the Duet

0

-

0

-

 

Preferred regimen

    

0.13

   Continuous

20

50.0

11

27.5

 

   Precoital

17

42.5

24

60.0

 

   Same

3

7.5

5

12.5

 

Preferred regimen of partner

    

0.34

   Continuous

18

45.0

12

30.0

 

   Precoital

19

47.5

22

55.0

 

   Same

3

7.5

6

15.0

 
  1. *P value for the comparison between diaphragm-naïve and diaphragm-experienced participants, based on Fisher's exact test